Islamic and British Rule Over India

I will be as objective as I can while stating my thoughts about it ... It was NOT that India never experienced battles or wars before the Islamic Invasion ... Of course there were many small states in the Indian Subcontinent ... who were all Hindus ... However they too had clashes amongst them ... winning and losing was quite "known" even at that time ... The differences between battles or wars among "Hindu only" and "Hindu and Islam" were, Hindu believed in following certain "ethics" even during a battle or war, while Islamic war used to be "non-ethical" and "barbaric" ... I believe that we could have won the Islamic war by believing in "intelligence" ... Indian Intelligence should have known that time, that Islam does not believe in following any ethics and is barbaric ... Indian spies during those times should have had a fair idea of how Islamic rule is ... taking a look at their countries, the way they treat their woman, easily gives an idea of how Islam is (of course there are few exceptions, but I am talking about the majority here ... ) ... If we could have taken the intelligence inputs seriously, we could have won any war against Islam ... but I am of the opinion that India at that time, mis-judged the enemy ... probably India was simply "over-confident" due to its own abundance ... Indians still believe that there were "betrayers" in India and they still exist ... But my opinion is, if we take "intelligence" seriously, "betrayals" can be avoided ... Anyways ... the end result is Islam was successful in invading India ... and it started showing its barbarism by sexual assault of Indian women and breaking Indian temples that hurt the religion ... It continued for 400 years ... that's a long long time ... long enough to make Hindus lose their "values" ... the core Hindu values of believing in "peace", "freedom", "education" ... that's poverty ... "core poverty" ... it's NOT the "poverty of money" which matters  ... its the "poverty of values" that matters ... if we have good core values, then money will automatically get fetched ... but since India lost its values, India was unable to fetch money ... even after Independence ... I believe that "women" and "religion" were the two core mistakes Islam has committed in India "repeatedly" ... for which Indians find it very hard to forgive and forget ... I think Islamic Invasion could NOT have been THAT big of a problem if these two core mistakes have been avoided by Islam ... because as far as "fair" winning and losing is concerned, India was well accustomed to it ... The core mistakes which Islam had made, the British have avoided ... or rather they did not make them ... British did not believe in touching Indian women or Hindu religion inappropriately ... of course there were British and Indian/Hindu battles/wars, but there is no "behind the back" attack ... the latest and most brutal attack of British, which was the "Jalian-wala baug" attack, killed the women and men equally ... and with guns ... It was Gandhiji's non-violence strategy, which made the sikhs/hindus NOT to "counter-attack" ... otherwise, British never stopped Hindus from "counter-attack" ... I believe that if Hindus/Sikhs had counter-attacked the British, it could have been a "fair" win-lose scenario ... Sikh community is a very brave community of India ... and "non-violence strategy" turned out to be extremely unfair to them ... Indians believe that British were sent back to their country ... they took Indian money with them ... that made India poor ... but the reality is Islam already had brought poverty to India ... that has harmed India a lot and unfortunately it will still take time for India to heal that harm ... Many Islamic population stayed back in India ... But there are few which are geniuses ... The majority of Islamic population in India is unfortunately poor ... some of them are only "financially poor" ... but some of them are "morally poor" ...